Obalka

Neurológia pre prax

Neurológia pre prax

2/2024

expand content minimize content

Neurológia pre prax


2024 1 2
2023 1 2 3 4 5 6
2022 1 2 3 4 5 6
2021 1 2 3 4 5 6
2020 1 2 3 4 5 6
2019 1 2 3 4 5 6
2018 1 2 3 4 5 6
2017 1 2 3 4 5 6
2016 1 2 3 4 5 6
2015 1 2 3 4 5 6
2014 1 2 3 4 5 6
2013 1 2 3 4 5 6
2012 1 2 3 4 5 6
2011 1 2 3 4 5 6
2010 1 2 3 4 5 6
2009 1 2 3 4 5 6
2008 1 2 3 4 5 6
2007 1 2 3 4 5 6
2006 1 2 3 4 5 6
2005 1 2 3 4 5 6
2004 1 2 3 4 5 6
2003 1 2 3 4 5 6
2002 1 2 3 4 5 6
2001 1 2 3 4
2000 1
1999

Neurológia pre prax


2020 1e
2010 S3
2009 S2
selection from articles
about journal

Neurológia pre prax is a journal that provides the latest insights primarily in the form of review articles on the diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders. The topics are approached from the perspective of experts in various medical fields, with practical information including experiences from individual neurological departments and clinics. Additionally, the journal includes congress reports, interesting findings from foreign press, and more, all aimed at assisting outpatient neurologists in their daily practice.

The journal is published in collaboration with the Slovak Neurological Society.

Chairman of the Editorial Board:

prof. MUDr. Ivan Rektor, CSc., FCMA, FANA

Vice-Chairman of the Editorial Board:

prof. MUDr. Pavel Traubner, PhD.

Editorial Board Members:

prof. MUDr. Milan Brázdil, Ph.D., FRCP
doc. MUDr. Vladimír Donáth, PhD.
prof. MUDr. Petr Kaňovský, CSc.,FEAN
prof. MUDr. Egon Kurča, Ph.D.
MUDr. Radim Mazanec, Ph.D.
MUDr. Pavel Ressner, Ph.D.
prof. MUDr. Robert Rusina, Ph.D.
doc. MUDr. Matej Škorvánek, Ph.D.

Extended Editorial Board Members:

doc. MUDr. Marek Baláž, Ph.D.
prof. MUDr. Michal Bar, Ph.D.
doc. MUDr. Hana Brožová, Ph.D.
MUDr. Miloslav Dvorák, PhD.
doc. MUDr. Edvard Ehler, CSc., FEAN
prof. MUDr. Zuzana Gdovinová, CSc.
prof. MUDr. Jana Haberlová, Ph.D.
doc. MUDr. Dana Horáková, Ph.D.
prof. MUDr. Jakub Hort, Ph.D.
prof. MUDr. Robert Jech, Ph.D.
prof. MUDr. Peter Kukumberg, PhD.
prof. MUDr. Jan Mareš, Ph.D.
prof. MUDr. Petr Marusič, Ph.D.
MUDr. Ján Necpál
MUDr. Svatopluk Ostrý, Ph.D.
doc. MUDr. Hana Ošlejšková, Ph.D.
prof. MUDr. Irena Rektorová, Ph.D.
prof. MUDr. Jan Roth, CSc.
prof. MUDr. Štefan Sivák, PhD.
prof. MUDr. Jarmila Szilasiová, PhD.
prof. MUDr. Karel Šonka, DrSc.
prof. MUDr. Ivana Štětkářová, CSc.
prof. MUDr. Stanislav Šutovský, PhD.
doc. MUDr. Aleš Tomek, Ph.D.
prof. MUDr. Peter Valkovič, PhD.
prof. MUDr. Manuela Vaněčková, Ph.D.
MUDr. Branislav Veselý, Ph.D.
MUDr. David Zeman, Ph.D.

SOLEN, s. r. o.

Ambrova 5
831 01 Bratislava

Editor in charge:

Michaela Malová

Mobile phone no.: +421 903 463 286
e-mail: malova@solen.sk

Mag. Helena Machánková

Mobile phone no.: +421 910 902 599
phone: +421 2 5465 0647
e-mail: machankova@solen.sk

Ján Kopčok

e-mail: kopcok@solen.sk

instructions for authors

Manuscript must be submitted in electronic format via email to: malova@solen.sk and redakcia@solen.sk. Submission of a printed manuscript is not required.

The Editorial team reserves the right to make minor stylistic adjustments to the text without consulting the author, who will be informed during the proofreading process. The editorial team also reserves the right to reject texts that do not align with the journal's concept or have not been approved through the peer review process. If necessary, the author's consent will be sought to shorten the manuscript. In case of any formal deficiencies, the manuscript will be returned to the author for revision.

The editors team reserve the right to self-manage the inclusion of unsolicited manuscripts that have passed the peer review process. Given the journal's practical focus, manuscripts should be written in a clear manner, emphasizing the practical application of the provided information in clinical practice.

Authors and co-authors are required to familiarize themselves with the rules of publication ethics, available in full on the journal's website. When submitting an article for publication, the main author must send a written declaration to the editorial office stating that the entire authorial collective is aware of the publication ethics rules and that there are no impediments to publishing the article. Legal relationships between the publisher and the author are governed by the provisions of the Copyright Act.

1. Concise title of the work (in Slovak and English), names and surnames of all authors, including titles and affiliations. The address of the main author, along with their phone number and email address, should be provided, and a portrait photograph of the main author (150 dpi) is required. Contact information for the main author should be included in the article.

2. Abstract and keywords: see formal requirements for the article.

3. English translation of the title, abstract, and keywords.

4. Main text: Length should adhere to the formal requirements for the article.

  • If you include images in document, please submit their original files separately with accurate captions. The minimum resolution for submitted imaged is 300 dpi. When sending photo documentation by mail, please send only high-quality originals. All figures should be labeled with the corresponding numbers as cited in the text.
  • In the case of image documentation previously published in another publication, it is necessary to provide the original source and obtain written consent from the copyright holder.

5. List of References: In-text citations should be presented in the format “author and year” in parentheses, e.g., (Rektor, 2006) or (Rektor and Kuba, 2006). If there are more than three authors, use “et al.” after the first author's name, e.g., (Smrčka et al., 2007). The list of references should be arranged alphabetically and numbered. The specific number of citations and the citation format should adhere to the formal requirements for the articles and the formatting guidelines.

1. Review Articles/Main Topic Articles/From the Frontiers of Neurology/Pharmacotherapy Articles

  • 2000 words (excluding abstracts, images, graphs, tables, schemes, legends, and references)
  • Abstract: 100 words, 5-10 keywords
  • Number of citations: 25-30
  • Images, tables, graphs, schemes: 8

2. Information from practice (Case Reports, Original Articles)

  • 1800 words (excluding abstracts, images, graphs, tables, schemes, legends, and references)
  • Abstract: 100 words, 4-8 keywords
  • Number of citations: 15-20
  • Images, tables, graphs, schemes: 8

The text should be divided into the following sections: introduction, materials and methods/ patient cohort and methods, results, discussion, and conclusion.

3. Video Case Reports

  • Length of the text: 1500 words (excluding abstracts, figures, graphs, tables, schemes, legends, and references)
  • Abstract: 100 words, 4-8 keywords
  • Number of citations: 10
  • Figures, tables, graphs, schemes: 8

The article along with an optional video recording will be published on the website. The author must obtain informed consent from the patient.

4. Neuroimaging Case Reports

  • 250 words (excluding abstracts, figures, graphs, tables, schemes, legends, and references)
  • No abstract, 4-8 keywords
  • Number of citations: 2
  • Images: 3

5. Controversies

  • Two separate contributions from two different authors – each with a length of 500 words (excluding images, graphs, tables, diagrams, legends, and references)
  • Number of citations for each contribution: 5
  • Images, tables, graphs, diagrams: 2 for each contribution

6. From the History of Neurology

  • 800 words (excluding abstracts, images, graphs, tables, diagrams, legends, and references)
  • Abstract: 100 words, 4-8 keywords
  • Number of citations: 15
  • Images, tables, graphs, diagrams: 4

7. Information/Comments/News

  • 500 words
  • Images, tables, graphs: 5

8. Laudations, Obituaries

  • 500 words
  • Images, photographs: 2
  • Font: Times New Roman, size 12, line spacing 1.5,
  • The total number of pages depending on the type of contribution.
  • Divide the article into smaller and more readable sections, and use subheadings and simple divisions if necessary. For original articles and case reports, adhere to the required structure described in manuscript requirements.
  • All abbreviations must be explained at their first use.
  • Parenthesis should always be round ().
  • Domesticated foreign expressions should be written either in accordance with the rules of Slovak orthography or in their original Latin form.
  • In the text, clearly indicate references to all graphical representations, tables, or charts, which should be created using MS Word or MS Excel.
  • For all types of contributions (reviews, original articles, and case reports), please ensure that the text adheres to the general rules of formal Slovak language appropriate for professional publications. For instance, when describing a case in a case report, use complete sentences with full verbs, not in a bullet-point or list format as in laboratory test results. Texts intended for review must be grammatically and stylistically correct.

References should follow the format “author and year” in round brackets, e.g. (Rektor, 2006). In the case of two authors, use “author and author, year,” e.g., (Rektor et Kuba, 2006). It there are more than three authors, use “author et al.,” e.g., (Smrčka et al., 2007)

List the bibliography at the end of the article in alphabetical order and number it. In the bibliography, list up to three authors.

Example of citation a journal article: in AMA format (American Medical Association)

  • Rektorova I, Klobusiakova P, Balazova Z, et al. Brain structure changes in nondemented seniors after six-month dance-exercise intervention. Acta Neurol Scand. 2020;141(1):90-97. doi:10.1111/ane.13181.

Example of citation a monograph according to the modified citation standard ČSN ISO 690:2011

  • Ošlejšková H. Dětská neurologie. Olomouc: Solen. 2015; 248 s. ISBN 978-80-7471-124-4.

Example of citation a chapter in a book according to the modified citation standard ČSN ISO 690:2011

  • Zumrová A. Opoždění psychického a motorického vývoje. Ošlejšková H. Dětská neurologie. Olomouc: Solen. 2015; str. 24-35. ISBN 978-80-7471-124-4.

Example of citation an electronic document

Example of citation a webpage:

  • Ministerstvo zdravotnictví České republiky [online]. MZČR: ©2010 [cit. 16.5.2018]. Available at: https://www.mzcr.cz
  • A portrait photograph of the author (if there are multiple co-authors, only the main author, or the author whose contact will be provided at the end of the article).
  • A statement declaring that the article has not been published or offered for publication in any other journal.
  • A statement confirming that the author and co-authors have familiarized themselves with the publication ethics guidelines (available in full on the journal's website) and that there are no obstacles to the publication of the article.
  • A declaration of any potential conflicts of interest by the author.
publication ethics

The following text expresses standards of ethical behavior of all parties participating in the process of publishing articles in Solen, s.r.o. journals: the author, the editor, the editorial board, the reviewer, the publisher.

The basis for these guidelines is the already existing policy of Elsevier publishing company and The Best Practice Guidlines for Journal Editors issued by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Decision-making regarding publishing of articles: The editor of the Solen company journals is responsible for decisions on which of the accepted articles will be published. The final decision on publication lies with the editorial board based on independent, double-blind review reports. The editor acts in compliance with the policy of the editorial board of the journal and with the legislation that comes into effect in the case of libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may consult their decisions with the editorial board or with the reviewers.

Fair play: The editor evaluates the manuscript according to its intellectual content regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnical origin, citizenship and nationality, or the authors` philosophies.

Discrecy/secrecy: Neither the editor nor any member of the editorial board is allowed to disclose any information on the received manuscript to anyone else than to the respective author, the reviewer, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors and to the publisher.

Review reports: A double-blind review process helps to increase the scientific quality of the articles and helps the editor in making decisions on inclusion of the article for publication.

The reviewer`s eligibility: The reviewer should notify the editor if they do not feel sufficiently qualified for the article evaluation, and thus excuse themselves from the review process.

Discrecy/secrecy: Every manuscript received for a review must be regarded as a confidential document and must not be shown nor discussed with persons not involved in the publishing process.

Objectivity: Reviews must be carried out objectively. Personal critical statements against the author`s personality are not acceptable. The reviewers are to state their opinions clearly and back them up with relevant arguments.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest: Information or ideas and thoughts attained from the reviews must be regarded as confidential and must not be used for personal benefit. The reviewers should not evaluate a manuscript in which a conflict of interest occurs, rising from competitivness, created in cooperation or other relationship or connections with the author, company, or institutions connected with the article.

Quality of the article: Each article must include detailed information and references that enable the reader to replicate the data. An article based on a research must include an exact record of the presented piece of work as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The condition for publishing clinical research is that the methods used must comply with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and are approved by a relevant ethical committee. The same rules must be respected also by a work based on experiments on animals. Improper or knowingly inaccurate statements mean unethical behavior and are not acceptable.

Originality and plagiarism: Only original works and articles, which have not been published anywhere else yet, nor have they been sent for publication to any other journal, are accepted for publication. If the author uses a work or words of any other author, this must be properly cited. If a picture documentation published anywhere else is re-printed, the original source must be cited and a written consent of the owner of the exclusive rights must be properly presented. Any form of plagiarism represents unethical publication behavior and will not be acceptable.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication: Generally speaking, the author should not publish a manuscript describing the same research in more than one journal or an original publication. Accepting the same manuscript into more than one journal shows unethical behavior and is not acceptable.

Acknowledgment of sources: Authors should cite those publications that might be significant for determining the nature of the article. Information gained on a personal basis, eg. in a conversation, correspondence, in a discussion with third parties, cannot be used or published without the statement (written consent) of the source.

Authorship of the article: The authorship should only relate to those who significantly contributed to the concept, design, execution, or interpretation of the presented study or article. All those who contributed to the article or study should be cited as co-authors. Those who participated in partial and important aspects of the particular project (research, article) should be cited or recorded as contributors. The author will ensure that all suitable co-authors are included in the article and that they have approved the final version and agreed on its submission for publication.

Conflicts of interest: In their manuscript, the authors must state all the financial or other significant conflicts of interest that could be interpreted as impacting the results or interpretation of the manuscript. All the resources of the financial support must be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works: If the author finds a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, it is their duty to notify the fact to the editor immediately and to become involved in removal or correction of the article.